HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33666 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Ram Milan Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Learned A.G.A. has informed that the notice to the informant has been served on 25.09.2025. 4. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.63 of 2025, under Sections 351(3), 75(2), 332बी B.N.S. and Section 9m/10 POCSO Act, Police Station Chandi Nagar, District Baghpat, during the pendency of trial. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegations are per se false. There is no medical corroboration of the incident. There is no recovery of any video whatsoever either. The FIR itself is delayed by about twenty two days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused also. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant has further argued that the age of the victim is 11 years, but it is a clear-cut case of false implication. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 25.07.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Dubey, Ram Milan Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kanhaiya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the delay in institution of FIR, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Kanhaiya, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. October 6, 2025 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 33666 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad