HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14817 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shrinath, learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 & 5 and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. This writ petition has been filed inter-alia for the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.4 to grant permission to the petitioner for joining the school of respondent no.5 and also renew his appointment in pursuance of contract letter dated 26.06.2013 within stipulated period, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. (ii) Issue any other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. (iii) Award the cost of petition to the petitioner" Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Physical Instructor pursuant to a contract dated 26.06.2013. Since then, he has worked up to 15.08.2024 satisfactorily, without there being any complaint against him. However, the petitioner fell seriously ill and was unable to perform his duties during the period from 16.08.2024 to 15.10.2024. After recovering from serious ailment, the petitioner placed an application dated 15.10.2024 to respondent no.5 along with a medical fitness certificate, requesting permission to rejoin his duties. Another application in this regard was also given to respondent no.4 on 16.10.2024. Despite the recommendation by the Block Education Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Moti Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Officer, Bhadohi, for permitting the petitioner to resume his work, the District Basic Education Officer has not paid any attention and is sitting tight over the matter. He, therefore, submits that a direction may be issued to respondent no.4 to pass appropriate orders in view of the recommendation made by respondent no.5, and considering the fact that the petitioner has rendered satisfactory service from 2013 to 2024. On the aforesaid, learned counsel for the respondents-BSA submits that in case a direction is issued to the authority concerned, the renewal of the petitioner’s appointment shall be considered sympathetically, in accordance with law, keeping in view the recommendation made by respondent no.5. Considering the facts of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.4, District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Bhadohi to decide the petitioner's representation dated 17.07.2025 sympathetically, in accordance with law, keeping in view the recommendation made by the respondent no.5, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. September 26, 2025 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 14817 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad