Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10228 (GAU)

ABDUL BAREK v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

Bail Appln./1135/2025 · 2025-05-25

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010070072025 2025:GAU-AS:6623 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1135/2025 ABDUL BAREK S/O MIYA HUSSAIN R/O DHARMAPUR BLOCK P.S. LALUK DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM PIN-784160 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:OHIDUL ISLAM S/O ABDUL SALAM R/ODHARMAPUR BLOCK P.S. LALUK P.O. KUTUBPUR DIST. LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-78705 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D K MEDHI, P BORUAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. B HUSSAIN(R-2),MR. A K HUSSAIN (R-2),DR. P AGARWAL, AMICUS CURIAE (R-2) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 26.05.2025 1. Heard Ms. P. Boruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. K. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam and Mr. A. K. Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. 2. Here in this case on earlier date the respondent No.2 was not represented and therefore learned counsel Dr. P. Agarwala was appointed as Amicus Curiae to represent the respondent No.2. 3. Today since Mr. Hussain is appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2, the name of the learned Amicus Curiae, Dr. P. Agarwala shall be deleted. 4. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for both the sides and also gone through the scanned copy of the LCR. 5. This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner does not deserve to be release on bail at this stage. 6. Therefore, the present bail application stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant