PRIYANKA SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CWP/5499/2025 · 2025-04-09
Sandeep Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10227 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10227 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5499 of 2025 Date of Decision: 09.04.2025 _______________________________________________________ Priyanka Sharma and Another …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Another ….Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 09, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?