PHOOL CHAND YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/34475/2025 · 2025-09-25
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102262 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102262 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34475 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard Shri Santosh Kumar Gupta holding brief of Shri Akhlesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Satyam Rawat, holding brief of Shri Vineet Sankalp, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 and 3.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to some defects in the writ petition, the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition. September 26, 2025 Sumaira Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vineet Sankalp (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Phool Chand Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad