Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010069102025 2025:GAU-AS:5705 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/765/2025 JOHEV RAMIZ @ JOVEZ RAMIZ S/O-RAMIZ AHMED,R/O-RGB ROAD,BYE LANE NO.02,HOUSE NO.01,LAXMI NAGAR, GANESHGURI,P.O AND P.S DISPUR, DIST-KAMRUP (M),ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M AHMED, N. CHOUDHURY,A. K. KANU,MR A. ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 08.05.2025 Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for Page No.# 2/3 grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioners, who are apprehending arrest in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 275/2025, under Sections 74/304(2)/281/342(2) of BNS. Case Diary has been received and I have perused the same. It is submitted by Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the present accused/petitioner already appeared before the I.O. after obtaining the order of interim pre-arrest bail and co-operated in the investigation of this case. He is still ready and willing to co-operate the I.O. in further investigation of this case if he is granted with the privilege of pre-arrest bail. In this context, Mr. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submitted that the petitioner is co-operating in the investigation of this case and his statement under Section 183 of BNSS is also recorded. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels of both sides, materials available in the Case Diary as well as the conduct of the accused/petitioner, who has already appeared before the I.O. and co-operated in the investigation of the case, I find that the custodial interrogation of the present accused/ petitioner is not necessary in this case and hence, I find it a fit case to extend the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail, granted to the accused/petitioner vide order dated 01.04.2025, is hereby made absolute in the same terms and conditions. Page No.# 3/3 The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of in terms above. The Case Diary be sent back. JUDGE Comparing Assistant