HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11951 of 2025 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Sri Utpal Chatterji, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time. 2. In view of statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. Sri Sumit Daga, Advocate, is present for the respondent. October 7, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Utpal Chatterji Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sumit Daga (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Subhash Chand .....Petitioner(s) Ghanshyam Mittal .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad