Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10223 (KAR)

KHAIRUN BEE AND ORS v. SHABBIR MIYAN

RFA/200106/2024 · 2025-06-04

Ravi V Hosmani

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2819 RFA No. 200106 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.200106 OF 2024 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. KHAIRUN BEE W/O LATE BASHEER MIYAN AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: KHANAPUR VILLAGE, TQ: BHALKI, DIST: BIDAR – 585 328. 2. SHABANNA D/O LATE BASHEER MIYAN AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: KHANAPUR VILLAGE, TQ: BHALKI, DIST: BIDAR – 585 328. 3. MALANG S/O LATE BASHEER MIYAN, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: KHANAPUR VILLAGE, TQ: BHALKI, DIST: BIDAR – 585 328. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI MAHADEV S.PATIL, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2819 RFA No. 200106 of 2024 AND: SHABBIR MIYAN S/O LATE HAMID SAB, AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KOLAR 'K' VILLAGE, NEAR BOMBONDESHWAR ROAD KOLAR K, TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR – 585 401. …RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND C.J.M., AT BIDAR IN O.S.NO.109/2022 AND CONSEQUENTLY DECREE THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFF WITH COST IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for appellants. 2. On 24.04.2025, when matter was listed for non- compliance of office objections for eighth time, this Court as a last chance had given weeks further time to comply with office objections and ordered matter to be listed for dismissal in case of non-compliance. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2819 RFA No. 200106 of 2024 3. As per registry note, office objections remain un- complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursing appeal. Therefore, appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE MSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27 Ct;Vk