Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10221 (RAJ)

GURUDEV SINGH S/O SHRI KASHMIR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3596/2025 · 2025-07-25

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27987] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3596/2025 Gurudev Singh S/o Shri Kashmir Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Opposite To Hanjar Farm House, Mardan Heri, Near Chhoti Nehar, Kethal Road, Police Station Asandh, District Karnal, Haryana (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Special Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 25/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0004/2022 registered at Police Station-Bhimganj Mandi, District- Kota City for the offence under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that from the conscious possession of the present petitioner, no recovery was affected though two cases of like nature are pending against him but both cases belong to below commercial quantity. The main accused-Mamta Soni and Vikram Singh have already been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the co-accused-Sukhdev Singh has been enlarged on bail by this [2025:RJ-JP:27987] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3596/2025] Court on 30.05.2025. He again submits that the petitioner is behind the Bars since 20.02.2025. No further custodial interrogation is required. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Gurudev Singh S/o Shri Kashmir Singh shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/43