Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102207 (ALL)

AMIT VERMA ALIAS AMIT KUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

NABAIL/7980/2025 · 2025-10-09

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7980 of 2025 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri J.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 303 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352, 109(1), 3(5), 117(2) of B.N.S., Police Station Bilhaur, District Kanpur Nagar. 4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the general and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the applicant. It is further submitted that the injuries suffered by the injured are on the non vital part and are of simple in nature. It is further submitted that the co-accused Rajat Alias Rajat Mansoori has already been granted Anticipatory Bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.09.2025, passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Application U/s 482 BNSS No.7776 of 2025, till submission of police report, if any, under Section 193(3) BNSS. It is further submitted that the applicant is having criminal history of 11 cases, which have been explained in the memo of application as well as in the supplementary affidavit filed today. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Verma Alias Amit Kumar Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) been stated that in case, applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 7. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicant and the fact that as per the medical report of the injured has received injuries on non vital parts of the body; the nature of injuries shows that there was no intent to murder; a vague and general role has been assigned to the applicant, at this stage, there is no substantive evidence against the applicant, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 8. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Amit Verma alias Amit Kumar Verma be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193 (3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 9. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. NABAIL No. 7980 of 2025 2 10. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 11. The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 12. The application stands disposed of. October 10, 2025 RKM NABAIL No. 7980 of 2025 3 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad