[2025:RJ-JP:38731] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6615/2006 Rajendra Prasad Sharma S/o Shri Dwarka Prasad Sharma, aged about 53 years, resident of Plot No. 24, Gautam Colony, Behind Akashwani, Mantown, Sawai Madhopur ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Secondary Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner 3. Deputy Director (Secondary), Education Department, Kota 4. District Education Officer (Secondary) Sawai Madhopur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prahlad Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 20/09/2025 1. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 16.06.2006, whereby fixation of his pay earlier in the pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 was cancelled and consequently, vide subsequent order dated 11.07.2006 by fixing his pay in the lower pay scale of Rs.5500-9000, even directions were also given to recover the excess amount earlier paid to the petitioner. 2. Thereafter, by way of filing rejoinder to the reply filed by the State Government, the petitioner has placed on record one letter dated 05.02.2007 issued by the Chief Accounts Officer, Secondary Education Rajasthan, Office of Directory Secondary [2025:RJ-JP:38731] (2 of 2) [CW-6615/2006] Education addressing to the Deputy Director Secondary Education in which it was mentioned that on account of completing 9 years of service as on 01.07.1998, the petitioner was eligible for the pay scale of Rs.6500-10,500 and after receiving such letter, in turn the Deputy Director Secondary Education, Kota directed the District Education Officer, Secondary Education Sawai Madhopur to take appropriate decision in furtherance of letter dated 05.02.2007. 3. In view of subsequent developments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date no final decision by way of passing an appropriate order has been taken by the respondents for allowing the pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents is also not in a position to verify this factual position. 5. In the light of above, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the writ petition with the directions to the respondents to pass appropriate orders and to take all consequential actions in accordance with law pursuant to letter dated 05.02.2007 (Annex.-11) and 11.04.2007 (Annex.-12) enclosed with the petition along with rejoinder and to communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /10