HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11988 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue a suitable direction for Civil Judge (SD), Court No.3, Mathura to decide petitioner/Defendant's Misc. Application No.387 of 2025 (Dinesh Chandra Agrawal Vs. Sunand Mittal) dated 22.08.2025, U/s 379 B.N.S.S. in Original Suit No.53 of 2025 K.B. Reality & Another Vs. Dinesh Chandra Agrawal & 2 Others, on the next date i.e.11.11.2025 or any other shortest time period fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforementioned misc. application is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Chaubey, Vikas Tiwari, Vimal Chandra Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dinesh Chandra Agrawal .....Petitioner(s) K.B. Reality And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) with a direction to the Civil Judge (SD), Court No.3, Mathura to consider and decide the aforesaid application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 6, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11988 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad