Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10214 (KAR)

PROP VEERAN GOUDA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/200499/2025 · 2025-06-17

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3134 CRL.P No. 200499 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.200499 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. PROP. VEERAN GOUDA S/O MALLIARJUN, AGE:37 YEARS, OCC: M/S SHREE SAI FERTILIZERS, HATTIKUNI ROAD, YADGIRI – 585201, R/O NO.4-5-203, KANAKA NAGAR, YADGIR, NEAR LAXMI TALKIES YADGIR, DIST.YADGIR – 585201. 2. JUNIOR SALES OFFICER, (WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT AS THERE IS NO SUCH POST IN THE COMPANY) HELICOM AGRO CHEMICALS LTD, PLOT NO.222, COTTON MARKET, NEW GUNJ KALABURAGI - 585104 REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGER, BALESHWAR P. TOMAR, M/S HELIOCON AGRO CHEMICAL LTD, PLOT NO.222, COTTON MARKET, NEHRU GUNJ, KALABURAGI – 585104. (V/O DTD. 16.04.2025 PETITION BY PETITIONER NO.2 IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN …PETITIONERS (BY KUM. VAISHNAVI MANGANE, ADVOCATE APPEARED FOR SRI. AVINASH A. UPLAONKAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3134 CRL.P No. 200499 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE CUM FERTILIZER INSPECTOR ADA, OFFICE-YADGIRI, NOW REPRESENTED BY ADDL SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH - 585107 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. ARATI PATIL ,HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS PRAYING TO EXERCISE INHERENT POWERS U/SEC. 528 OF BNSS EXAMINE THE RECORDS AND QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CC No.1722/2023, FOR THE OFFENCE U/S 19(A) AND (b) OF FERTILIZER (CONTROL) ORDER, 1985 AND SECTION 3 AND 7 OF ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT 1955, PENDING BEFORE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIRI AGAINST THE PETITIONERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) Heard Kum.Vaishnavi Mangane, Advocate for Sri Avinash A. Uplaonkar, learned counsel for petitioner and Smt. Arati Patil, learned High Court Government Pleader. 2. Present petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita-2025, with the following prayer: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3134 CRL.P No. 200499 of 2025 “WHEREFORE, it is prayed that the Hon’ble Court be pleased to exercise inherent powers u/Section 528 of BNSS examine the records and quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1722/2023, for the offence u/S 19(a) and (b) of Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 and Section 3 and 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, pending before Civil Judge and JMFC, Yadgir, against the petitioners, in the interest of justice and equity.” 3. Facts of the case in brief which are utmost necessary for disposal of the present petition are as under: Respondent-complainant said to have visited the shop of the petitioner on 04.09.2024 and inspected the shop and seen the fertilizer 17:17:17 which was being stocked in the shop for the purpose of selling to the farmers. 60 bags of such fertilizers were seized and samples were drawn and sent for chemical examination. After receipt of the report it was found that the fertilizer which was stored and stocked for selling to farmers were of substandard quality and thereby, petitioner has committed an offence under Clause 19(a) and (b) of the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3134 CRL.P No. 200499 of 2025 4. Petitioner is before this Court on the ground that the manufacturer is not impleaded as party as is required under Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act. 5. On perusal of the petition, compliance has not been made by the complainant and therefore, taking cognizance and summoning the petitioner cannot be countenanced in law. 6. This Court, in similar matters in Crl.P.No.200052/2023 and connected matters has taken said view and has quashed the pending proceedings. Therefore, order taking cognizance needs to be quashed. 7. Hence, the following: ORDER (i) Criminal Petition is allowed. (ii) The pending criminal proceeding against the petitioner in C.C.No.1722/2023 on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Yadgir, is hereby quashed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43/CT:PK