PINKI DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/22286/2025 · 2025-10-06
Ajay Bhanot, Garima Prashad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102128 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102128 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22286 of 2025 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE MRS. GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Personal affidavit filed by learned A.G.A. for the State is taken on record. The petitioners have been nominated in the F.I.R. as the principal offenders in the instant case. The case diary available with the learned A.G.A. contains the statements of various prosecution witnesses. One of the injured witnesses has identified the petitioners as prime accused in the instant case. The injured had suffered grievous injuries which are corroborated by the medical report. The case diary also records that during the course of investigation, offence under Section 109 B.N.S. has been disclosed and the relevant alterations have been made. It is noteworthy that the writ-petition has been filed without bringing relevant evidences including the medical report of the injured in the record. Further, the statements of the various witnesses has also not been appended. The writ petition is liable to be dismissed on Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Singh Yadav, Rakesh Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Pinki Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
account of suppression of material facts. However, in view of the fact that prima facie offence is disclosed from the record, the writ petition is being dismissed on merits. The writ petition is dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
October 7, 2025 Sachin Mishra CRLP No. 22286 of 2025 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad