HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33117 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. This matter has been taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Mr. Ehtesham Afsar Khan, learned counsel for the applicants and Mohd. Sauood, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State respondents. 3. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of Case No. 905 of 2024, State vs. Salauddin and others arising out of Case Crime No. 292 of 2023, under Sections 147, 323, 336, 427 IPC, P.S. Bithri Chainpur, District Bareilly pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly in terms of the compromise dated 2.9.2024. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and the opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has already been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicant and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicants. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants. 6. In view of the fact that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ehtesham Afsar Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mohd Sauood Slauddin And 19 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Case No. 905 of 2024, State vs. Salauddin and others arising out of Case Crime No. 292 of 2023, under Sections 147, 323, 336, 427 IPC, P.S. Bithri Chainpur, District Bareilly pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly in terms of the compromise dated 2.9.2024. are hereby quashed. 8. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 24, 2025 Abhishek A482 No. 33117 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad