Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10211 (KAR)

SUVARNALATA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS

WP/202006/2024 · 2025-04-15

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2295 WP No. 202006 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.202006 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SUVARNALATA W/O PRABHAKAR, AGE : 52 YEARS, OCC: WORKER TEACHER, R/O. KALASUMBI COLONY, RAICHUR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHUBHENDU A. AKALWADI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND LEGISLATION, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY, 6TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU. 3. THE DIRECTORATE OF VOCATIONAL COURSES, BY ITS DIRECTOR, 3RD FLOOR, P.U. BUILDING, 18TH CROSS, SAMPIGE ROAD, Digitally signed by VARSHA N RASALKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2295 WP No. 202006 of 2024 MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PRE-UNIVERSITY & DEPARTMENT OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION, RAICHUR, DIST: RAICHUR. 5. METHODIST COMPOSITE PU COLLEGE BY ITS PRINCIPAL, TQ & DIST: RAICHUR. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE THE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE RELIEVE ORDER PASSED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT ON 16.06.2011 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ISSUE THE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO ABSORB THE SERVICE OF PETITIONER FORM THE DATE OF HIS RELIEVING ORDER AS WELL AS WITH ALL ARREARS AND MONITORY BENEFITS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) No representation on petitioner’s side on call. The writ petition was filed in the month of April, 2024 and till now office objection is not complied. Also there is no representation on petitioner’s side on call. These facts - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2295 WP No. 202006 of 2024 reveals that the petitioner is not interested in pursing the writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objection. Sd/- (Dr.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3 CT:NI