APHC010115082020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 7135/2020 Between: 1. PILLA CHAKRAM, S/O. P. CHITTODU (LATE) AGED 55 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, RIO H.NO.49/B SC COLONY, CHENDURTHI VILLAGE, GOLLAPROLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. SMT. G. NAGAMANI, W/O SATHI BABU, AGED 37 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, KOLANKA VILLAGE, PITHAPURAM, H.NO.3-71. EG DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EG DISTRICT, KAKINADA 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EG DISTRICT KAKINADA 4. THE TAHSILDAR, GOLLAPROLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHENDURTHI PS CHENDURTHI VILLAGE, GOLLAPROLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 6. SAGI RAJU SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O BHASKAR RAJU AGED 60 YEARS, OCCUPATION -- AGRICULTURE, RIO CHENDURTHI VILLAGE, GOLLAPROLU MANDAL, EG DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or directions, more in the nature of writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the 2 and 3rd respondents in restraining 5th respondent from interfering in civil and property disputes of petitioner land Ac.4.49 cents in Sy.No.4511 of Chendurthi Village, Gollaproulu Mandal, EG District at the instance of party respondents is concerned, contrary to well settled principle of law in catena of decision laid down by Honorable Courts, in pursuance of 2 representations dated 16.12.2019 and 23.12.2019 filed by the petitioner is concerned, Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S V INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “....to issue writ, order or directions, more in the nature of writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents in restraining 5th respondent from interfering in civil and property disputes of petitioner land Ac.4.49 cents in Sy.No.4511 of Chendurthi Village, Gollaproulu Mandal, EG District at the instance of party respondents is concerned, contrary to well settled principle of law in catena of decision laid down by Honorable Courts, in pursuance of representations dated 16.12.2019 and 23.12.2019 filed by the petitioner is concerned ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions, would submit that respondent Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.6 and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 3 In the light of the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 7135 2020 12.09.2025 Mjl /*