HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11932 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " (a) issue an, order or direction to direct the Court below to decide the application (6-C) filed alongwith the Suit No. 216 of 2024 (Bushra Vs. Soyab Alam and others), which is pending before learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Garhmukteshwar, Hapur. (b) Issue an, order or direction to direct directing the parties to maintain status quo over the land in dispute till the disposal of the application (6C) pending before the court below." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Garhmukteshwar, Hapur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 26, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeet Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Bushra .....Petitioner(s) Shoyeb Alam And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad