[2025:JHHC:11783 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. 3099 of 2025 Nepal Das @ Deepak Das, Aged about 35 years, Son of Haradhan Das @ Sukhlal Das, Resident of Quarter No.1142 street -19 8/B, Near Harla Thana Sector-9 P.O-Harla and P.S-Harla Bokaro Steel City, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Pratibha Devi wife of Deepak Das, resident of at Simuliya, Gudri, P.O- Rangamatiya, P.S-Chandankiyari, Bokaro, Jharkhand, presently residing at Sector- 4/E, Street, 09, QR No. 2137, Bokaro, Mahilla, P.O and P.S- Chas, Boakro, District- Bokaro … opp. parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Amit , Adv. For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Addl. PP For the opp. party no. 2 : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari , Adv. 02 / 21.04.2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the opp. party no. 2 has filed the vakalatnama today. Keep the same in the record. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chas Mahila P.S. Case No.14 of 2022 registered under sections 498A/ 307, 328, 379, 323, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3/4 of D.P. Act and under Section 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the husband of the informant has treated the informant with cruelty in connection with demand of dowry. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been given the privilege of anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 14.09.2023 passed in ABA No. 9746 of 2022 with the condition that the he will produce the marriage certificate within six months from the date of his surrender before the court below but he could not produce the marriage certificate because of the non- cooperation of the informant, hence, the bail granted to the petitioner has been cancelled. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 18.02.2025 , as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted on regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Bokaro in connection with Chas Mahila P.S. Case No.14 of 2022 with the condition that the petitioner will not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-