1 2025:CGHC:36976 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1672 of 2023 1 - Chitendra Singh Rajput S/o Ramendra Singh Rajput, Aged About 40 Years R/o Kaneri, Kothitola, Tehsil Dengargarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya P.S. Rakhi, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Committee For Redressal Of Transfer Matter, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya P.S. Rakhi, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Under Seceretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya P.S. Rakhi, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Office Of Collector, Land Record Branch, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Ranjit Singh, Occupation Revenue Inspector, Working In Office Of Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Collector, Land Records Branch, Rajnadgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Kumar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Ms. M. Asha, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/07/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ and quash the impugned order dated 30/9/22 (Annexure P-5) to the extent of petitioner services in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ and quash the impugned order dated 1/12/22 (Annexure P-8) in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to produce the entire record of transfers of the petitioner for perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 3 10.4 Any relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be passed in favor of the petitioner together with cost of the petition..” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent/State agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat