GUFRAN @ MOHD GUFRAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
CRLP/22312/2025 · 2025-09-25
Rajiv Gupta, Rajiv Lochan Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22312 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. Shri Vikas Singh, Advocate has made a statement at the Bar he has filed his Vakalatnama in the Registry on 25.9.2025, however, the same is not on record.
2. Office to trace out the same and place it on record.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5, learned A.G.A. for the State.
4. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with the liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 as well as learned A.G.A. has no objection.
6. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
7. The certified copy of the impugned FIR be returned back to the learned counsel for the petitioner as per the Rules. September 26, 2025 R Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishal Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Vikas Singh (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Gufran @ Mohd Gufran .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad