Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10205 (BOM)

THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BEED THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER v. RAJENDRA SADASHIV CHANDANE

WP/4080/2016 · 2025-01-17

Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} wp4071-16.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4071 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4067 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4068 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4070 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4072 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4078 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4080 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4081 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4082 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4084 OF 2016 The Municiapl council Beed, Through Chief Officer PETITIONER VERSUS Yashodabai Waman Borde RESPONDENT ....... Mr. S. P. Sonwane h/f Mr. S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioner ....... [CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.] DATE : 17 th JANUARY, 2025 ORDER : 1. Mr. Indiani, learned Advocate submits that his appearance on behalf of the Respondents may be discharged. 2. It is submitted that in the present Writ Petitions 2025:BHC-AUG:1416 {2} wp4071-16.doc maintainability of Complaints before District Consumer Forum is challenged. However, during pendency of present Writ Petitions, the Complaints itself have been disposed of by the District Consumer Forum and hence nothing survives in the Writ Petitions. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned Advocate for the Petitioner, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of as infructuous. [ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE ] JUDGE drp/wp4071-16.doc