Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102047 (MAD)

E.SUDHAKAR v. The Superintendent of Police

CRL OP/25606/2025 · 2025-09-18

N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.25606 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.09.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.25606 of 2025 E.Sudhakar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Cheyyar Thiruvannamalai District 3.The Inspector of Police Peranamllur Police Station Thiruvannamalai District (Cr.No.49 of 2022) ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to transfer the investigation in Cr.No.49 of 2022 from the 3rd respondent police to any other investigation agency and conduct fresh enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Esakkimuthu For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25606 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner seeks for a direction to transfer the investigation for conducting fresh enquiry. 2. The petitioner is the defacto complainant had lodged a complaint on 1.02.2022 for the alleged theft of 11 sovereigns gold jewels and 600 grams of silver articles and the respondent police has registered FIR in Cr.No.49 of 2022 for the offences under Sections 454 & 380 of IPC. According to the petitioner, though the FIR has been registered in the year 2022, the same has not been investigated properly. Whereas, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that accused could not be identified; more than 12 suspect persons' finger prints were sent for examination, however, they were not matching the evidence collected in the crime scene. Therefore, the FIR has been closed. 3. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record. 4. Let the respondents continue to monitor and if any finger print matches with the crime, the respondent police shall re-open the case and file a final report. Therefore, at this stage, this Court is of the view that 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25606 of 2025 transfer is not required. 5. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed. 18.09.2025 dhk Neutral Citation :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No To 1.The Superintendent of Police Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Cheyyar Thiruvannamalai District 3.The Inspector of Police Peranamllur Police Station Thiruvannamalai District 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25606 of 2025 N. SATHISH KUMAR , J. dhk Crl.O.P.No.25606 of 2025 18.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis