Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102044 (MAD)

G.CHELLAPPA v. THE MANAGER

WP/35154/2025 · 2025-09-19

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 35154 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 35154 and 35158 of 2025 W.P.No.35154 of 2025 1. G.Chellappa Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Manager Indian Bank, Viomedu Branch, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapatinam Distirct Respondent(s) WP No. 35158 of 2025 1. G.Chellappa Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Manager Indian Bank, Viomedu Branch, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapatinam Distirct Respondent(s) PRAYER in WP No. 35154 of 2025 This writ petition is filed under Article 226 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35154 of 2025 of constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing to the respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated to take immediate action to grant education loan to the petitioners son dated 23.07.2025. PRAYER in WP No. 35158 of 2025: This petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing to the respondent to consider the petitioners representation to take immediate action to grant education loan to the petitioners son dated 23.07.2025. For Petitioner(s): R.Muruga Bharathi ORDER This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations dated 23.07.2025 to take immediate action to grant education loan to the petitioners children. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he made a representation before the respondent for granting loan for the education purpose of the children of the petitioner and the same is not considered and hence, the present writ petitions have been filed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35154 of 2025 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court may issue a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondent and hence, notice to the respondent is dispensed with. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 23.07.2025 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 19-09-2025 rli https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35154 of 2025 M.DHANDAPANI J. rli Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Manager Indian Bank, Viomedu Branch, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapatinam Distirct WP No. 35154 and 35158 of 2025 19.09.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35154 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis