Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10202 (UTT)

SHOKEEN AHMED AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/504/2025 · 2025-09-13

Daily Lok Adalat

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 13.09.2025 CRLR No. 504 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. S.K. Shandilya, Advocate for the revisionist. Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned A.G.A. alongwith Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State. Ms. Nancy Singh, learned counsel for the private respondents. The case is taken up today before the National Lok Adalat. Before the Lok Adalat, the parties have agreed to settle the matter. The terms of the compromise have been recorded in a separate compromise sheet which shall form part of the order. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties before the Lok Adalat, the present criminal revision stands disposed of. The impugned judgment and order dated 25.07.2024 passed by learned 1st Additional Session Judge, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Appeal No. 38 of 2024 is set aside. The impugned judgment and order dated 13.03.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate/II Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Complaint Case No. 07 of 2019 (Old Complaint Case No. 8354 of 2018) is also set aside. Conviction and sentence awarded to the revisionist is also set-aside. He is acquitted of the charge of offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Compounding application stands disposed of accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mahra, J.) 13.09.2025 Ujjwal