CRM-M-53133-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 122 CRM-M-53133-2025 Date of Decision: 19.09.2025 Jyo and others ...Peoners Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Ashish Sheokand, Advocate for the peoners. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, D.A.G. Haryana. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. The present peon has been filed under Secon 528 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking direcons for registraon of FIR against private respondents for cheang, forgery, criminal conspiracy, criminal beach of trust and criminal inmidaon in relaon to tampering and manipulaon of internal marks at Chaudhary Ranbir Singh University, Jind and for further direcons for an imparal invesgaon through SIT/CBI or an independent high level commi5ee by the Higher Educaon Department, Government of Haryana. 2. At the outset, counsel for the peoner submits that he would be contended and sasfied, in case he is permi5ed to file a fresh representaon and concerned authority be directed to decide the same in a me bound manner. 3. Noces are served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondents nor the issuance of noces to the private respondents is required. 4. Let the peoners file a representaon, supported by a notarized affidavit, to the concerned Superintendent of Police within two weeks from today. If the peoners file such representaon within the above-menoned me period of two weeks, then, the same shall be decided by the concerned Superintendent of Police, within three months, either himself/herself or by authorizing and delegang it to any officer holding HPS cadre. It is clarified that such order must be a reasoned order, and the same be communicated to the representaonists without delay. In the representaon, peoners to menon the email id of his counsel so that the concerned officer could communicate them the outcome. JYOTI 2025.09.19 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-53133-2025 5. Liberty reserved to the peoners to file fresh peon or to take other legal remedies in accordance with the law. 6. It is clarified that there is no adjudicaon on merits. It is further clarified that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogaon of the peoners is required in any cognizable case. 7. There would be no need for a cerfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Peoners and State can download this order and other relevant parculars from the official web page of this court and aest it to be a true copy. The concerned officer can also verify its authencity and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use. Pe++on is allowed to the extent men+oned above. All pending applicaons, if any, stand disposed. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 19.09.2025 Jyo-II Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No. JYOTI 2025.09.19 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.