Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10200 (ALL)

URMILA v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/2705/2025 · 2025-01-24

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13009 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2705 of 2025 Applicant :- Urmila Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Prakash Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 205 of 2024, registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 109, 352 B.N.S., Police Station- Uska Bazar, District- Siddharth Nagar, during pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He next submitted that both the parties have lodged F.IR. against each other for the alleged incident. Total 19 persons were named in the instant first information report. In the event of alleged fight between the parties, total six persons have received injuries. He further submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. Applicant has no criminal antecedents to her credit. Applicant is languishing in jail since 03.11.2024. Further, co-accused, namely, Suggriv and Pradeep, have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 17.01.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 526 of 2025. Applicant claims parity with the co-accused persons. In case, the applicant is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Urmila, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Aditya Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad