216. IN THE HIGH COURT OF Iqbal alias Nanha State of Haryana CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL 1. grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. under Sections 27 of Arms Act District Sonipat. 2. apprised this Court that the case is nearing conclusion as it is now fixed for final arguments, with the defence witnesses also having been examined. 3. instructions received by the learned State counsel 4. counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition. 5. May 14, 2025 sanjeev IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Iqbal alias Nanha Versus State of Haryana HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Rakesh Kumar Lathwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ----- MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Section grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. under Sections 302, 120-B, 34 of IPC (Section 201 of IPC and Sections 25, 27 of Arms Act added lateron), registered at Police Station District Sonipat. At the outset, learned State counsel has, on instructions, apprised this Court that the case is nearing conclusion as it is now fixed for final arguments, with the defence witnesses also having been examined. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not d instructions received by the learned State counsel In view of the instructions received by the learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant Dismissed as not pressed. May 14, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-54573-2024 Date of decision: 14.05.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondent HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Prayer in this petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.27, dated 23.05.2021, (Section 201 of IPC and Sections 25, registered at Police Station GRP-Sonipat, the outset, learned State counsel has, on instructions, apprised this Court that the case is nearing conclusion as it is now fixed for final arguments, with the defence witnesses also having been examined. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the instructions received by the learned State counsel. In view of the instructions received by the learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No is for , (Section 201 of IPC and Sections 25, Sonipat, the outset, learned State counsel has, on instructions, apprised this Court that the case is nearing conclusion as it is now fixed for isputed the In view of the instructions received by the learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.05.14 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document