DHARMENDRA PRAKASH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS
WRIC/34423/2025 · 2025-09-25
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101989 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101989 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34423 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner Ist, Varanasi Division Varanasi to decide the Appeal No. 154 of 2024 computerized case No. C202414000000154 (Dharmendra Prakash Yadav and others Versus Rajpati and others) under section 207 of U.P Revenue Code-2006, pending before the respondent No. 2 in respect of Araji No. 417 area 0.510 hectare situated in Village Utirai, Pargana _and Tehsil Madiyahun, District Jaunpur arising out of partition suit No. 3413 of 2019 (computerized case No. T201914360603413) under section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code-2006."
2. It is contended that an appeal registered as Appeal No.154 of 2024 ( Computerized case No. C202414000000154) filed under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending consideration in partition suit. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is to decide the aforesaid appeal expeditiously.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon Additional Commissioner Ist, Varanasi Division, Varanasi to decide Appeal No.154 of 2024 (Computerized case No. C202414000000154) filed under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending in partition suit, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Dharmendra Prakash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 26, 2025 SK Goswami WRIC No. 34423 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad