IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209 CWP-29873-2024 Date of Decision:- 19.09.2025 AMRIT SINGH ....Petitioner(s) Versus UCO BANK ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr. L.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Komal Bishnoi, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Chadha, Advocate for Mr. Shekhar Verma, Advocate for respondent-Bank. * * * * SHEEL NAGU, C.J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for re-schedule/settlement under the One Time Settlement Scheme (OTS Scheme). 2. In view of order of even date passed in CWP-23201-2022 titled Amrit Singh Vs. UCO BANK, the present petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 19.09.2025 S.Sharma i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No SANDAL SHARMA 2025.09.20 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment