Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101967 (ALL)

BAHADUR MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/34485/2025 · 2025-10-09

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34485 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. October 10, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neha Rajput, Parmeshwar Kr. Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Bahadur Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad