Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101959 (PNJ)

MAHENDER SINGH v. RAKESH KUMAR AND OTHERS

COCP/3593/2023 · 2025-08-06

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 104-I Mahender Singh Rakesh Kumar and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the dated 20.10.2023 (Annexure P this Court in RSA Kumar and another”, in which while notice of motion was issued, the learned co judgment and decree till the next date of hearing. inclined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner, he seeks to withdraw take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per law, if any. COCP-3593-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3593 Date of decision : Mahender Singh Versus Rakesh Kumar and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate Proxy counsel for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order dated 20.10.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co this Court in RSA-2174-2023 titled as “Mahender Singh vs. Rakesh Kumar and another”, in which while notice of motion was issued, the learned co-ordinate Bench had stayed the operation of the impugned judgment and decree till the next date of hearing. After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner, he seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per law, if any. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3 of 2023 (O & M) Date of decision :-06.08.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt respondent(s) for not complying the order 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of 2023 titled as “Mahender Singh vs. Rakesh Kumar and another”, in which while notice of motion was issued, the ate Bench had stayed the operation of the impugned judgment and decree till the next date of hearing. After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the the present petition with liberty to take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per law, if any. VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.06 20.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document August 06 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-3593-2023 (O & M) Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 6, 2025 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.06 20.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document