IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (218) COCP-4246-2024 Date of Decision: - 17.09.2025 Sumitra ....Petitioner Versus Anand Mohan Sharan and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Raj Partap Singh Brar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel has submitted that in terms of the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the representation of the petitioner has been decided. 2. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to rebut the said aspect. 3. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case any cause survives. ( VIKAS BAHL ) September 17, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.09.18 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement