APHC010114102020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7073/2020 Between: 1. ALLAMPATI RANGA REDDY, S/O. LATE KRISHNA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, MAMUDURU VILLAGE, CHEJ ARIA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATMAKUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PADALAKUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHEJ ARIA, CHEJ ARIA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. YADLURI SEENAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MAMUDURU VILLAGE, CHEJ ARIA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. DASARI NARAYANA, HINDU AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, MPDO, CHEJARLA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 8. M SREEVASU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, PANCHAYAT RAJ ASSISTANT ENGINEER, INCLIARGE CUM-SPL OFFICER, CHEJARLA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRET. 9. BALIREDDY RAMADEVI, W/O. SUDHAKAR REDDY, HINDU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, EX.- SARPANCH, MARNUDURU VILLAGE, CHEJARLA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 10. BALIREDDY SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O. LATE PANCHALA REDDY HINDU AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, MA-NUDURU 2 VILLAGE, CHEJARLA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 5th respondent in not registering the and investigate in to the complaint of the petitioner dated 26-02-2020 as wholly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the 5th respondent to register the crime and investigate in to the complaint given by the petitioner dated 26.02.2020 against the respondents 6 to 10 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOPPARTHI SUMATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the subject matter of this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 7073 of 2020 12.09.2025 Mjl/*