IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4596/2025 Decided on: 28.03.2025 Vipan Kumar …Petitioner Versus HPRTC & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Ms. Anchal, Advocate vice Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs:- “ a) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing respondent corporation regularize services of the petitioner from his initial date of appointment and treat petitioner as appointee on regular appointee with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice. b) That or in alternative, the respondent corporation may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioners immediately after one year, by modifying regularization order Annexure P-2, with all consequential benefits in view of judgment by this Hon'ble Court in case CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020 titled as Vikram Singh versus HRTC and others.” 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. Learned vice counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner has already been adjudicated Vikram Singh Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation2. Learned vice counsel further submitted that the petitioner would be content, if the case of the petitioner, is considered by the respondents, in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time-bound schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 28th March, 2025(rohit) 21CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020 decided on 09.11.2023.