Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101920 (ALL)

KAMALA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/34426/2025 · 2025-09-25

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34426 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 31.07.2025 passed by Tehsildar, Tehsil Sadar, District-Mau (Responderunt No.4) in Suit No.RST/03726/2009 and Computer Case No. T-20191550103726 (Kamala Versus Baijnath). (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent no.3 to decide the appeal no. Nil of 2025 (Kamala Devi Versus Baijnath) pending before Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil-Sadar, District-Mau and mutated the name of petitioner on Arazi No. 113 Area 0.170 Hectare situated at Village Khukhundwa, Kopaganj, District-Mau within stipulated period by this Hon'ble Court." 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the first prayer made in the writ petition, and is only confining to his second prayer which is for expeditious disposal of the appeal filed under Section 35(2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondent, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon authority concerned to decide the Appeal No.NIL of 2025 (Kamala Devi Versus Baijnath), under section- 35(2) of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Ram, Brahma Nand Pandey, Rajendra Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kamala Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 26, 2025 SK Goswami WRIC No. 34426 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad