IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 109 Nisha and another State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- None. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The petitioners namely Court under Article protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents. It is averred from the petition that both the and are staying together in live not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. (Annexure P-3) against the threat extended at the hands of the privat respondents already stand submitted by the peti No.2-Superintendent of Police, Panipat as well as respondent No.3 House Officer, Police Station It is further averred from the petition tha threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of implicated in a false case. It is IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10178 Date of decision: and another VERSUS Haryana and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ None. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioners namely Nisha and Monu under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents. It is averred from the petition that both the and are staying together in live-in relationship. H not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private e threatening the petitioners. A representation ) against the threat extended at the hands of the privat respondents already stand submitted by the peti Superintendent of Police, Panipat as well as respondent No.3 House Officer, Police Station Sadar Panipat, District Panipat It is further averred from the petition tha threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of implicated in a false case. It is revealed that Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 10178-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 18.09.2025 . ..Petitioners ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Nisha and Monu have approached this of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents. It is averred from the petition that both the petitioners are major in relationship. However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private epresentation dated 13.09.025 ) against the threat extended at the hands of the private respondents already stand submitted by the petitioners to the respondent Superintendent of Police, Panipat as well as respondent No.3-Station Sadar Panipat, District Panipat. It is further averred from the petition that petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being that Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar and ...Respondents SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.18 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 109 CRWP SHO, Police Station Sadar Yamuna Nagar have been arrayed as No.2 and 3 in memorandum of parties due to inadvertence. However, the petitioners and respondent No.4 belong to Panipat. Representation dated 13.09.2025 (Annexure P and Station House Officer P In view of the above with a direction to District Panipat petition and also expressed (Annexure P-3) liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against th construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and ab Police Station Sadar Panipat, District Panipat 18.09.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable CRWP-10178-2025(O&M) SHO, Police Station Sadar Yamuna Nagar have been arrayed as No.2 and 3 in memorandum of parties due to inadvertence. However, the petitioners and respondent No.4 belong to Panipat. Representation dated Annexure P-3) is also sent to Superintendent of Police, Panipat and Station House Officer Panipat. In view of the above, the present petition is being disposed of with a direction to Station House Officer, Police Station to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation dated ) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to Sadar Panipat, District Panipat for requisite compliance. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 SHO, Police Station Sadar Yamuna Nagar have been arrayed as respondent No.2 and 3 in memorandum of parties due to inadvertence. However, the petitioners and respondent No.4 belong to Panipat. Representation dated is also sent to Superintendent of Police, Panipat , the present petition is being disposed of House Officer, Police Station Sadar Panipat, to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the representation dated 13.09.2025 and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has e petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with said representation to Station House Officer, for requisite compliance. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.18 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document