Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10191 (RAJ)

J P GOTHWAL v. STATE OF RAJ AND ANR

CW/15435/2011 · 2025-03-18

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12290] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15435/2011 J P Gothwal, R.A.S., Secretary Raj. Schedules Caste and Schedules Tribe Commission, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretry Karmik (Ka-3/Janch) Vibhag, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.S. L. Songara For Respondent(s) : Mr.Prakahar Jain for Mr.Archit Bohra, Addl.GC. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 18/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge- sheet issued under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1958 upon the petitioner has resulted into his exoneration from all the charges. Counsel submits that under these circumstances, the petitioner is entitled for the due consequential benefits, so liberty be granted to the petitioner to file a detailed comprehensive representation, before the respondent-authorities with regard to redressal of his grievances. Counsel submits that the respondents may be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within the time frame. [2025:RJ-JP:12290] (2 of 2) [CW-15435/2011] 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has no objection, in case, such direction is issued by this Court. 3. Considering the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. It is expected from the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months. 4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/ direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular manner. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /220