Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101907 (PNJ)

NITIN AHUJA v. ANJANA BEHL

FAO/166/2023 · 2025-05-08

Meenakshi I Mehta, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Nitin Ahuja Anjana Behl CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present: Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Mr. Shrey Sachdeva, Advocate and Ms. Shruti Singla, Advocate for the respondent. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant on instructions prays to withdraw the appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objec 3. In view thereto, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The decree passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gurugram, is affirmed. The litigation expenses in terms of order dated 09.08.2023, shall be released to the petitioner. 4. All pendi 08.05.2025 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-166 Date of Decision: 08.05.2025 Vs. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shrey Sachdeva, Advocate and Ms. Shruti Singla, Advocate for the respondent. *** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant on instructions prays to withdraw the appeal. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objec In view thereto, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The decree passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gurugram, is affirmed. The litigation expenses in terms of order dated 09.08.2023, shall be released to the petitioner. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 166-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.05.2025 …Appellant …Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant. Sumeet Mahajan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shrey Sachdeva, Advocate and Ms. Shruti Singla, Advocate for the respondent. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant on instructions prays to Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. In view thereto, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The decree passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gurugram, is affirmed. The litigation expenses in terms of order dated 09.08.2023, shall be released ng misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the appellant on instructions prays to In view thereto, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The decree passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gurugram, is affirmed. The litigation expenses in terms of order dated 09.08.2023, shall be released RAJESH KUMAR 2025.05.09 13:41 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.