Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101898 (PNJ)

PRABHU DAYAL YADAV v. NISHANT KUMAR YADAV AND OTHERS

COCP/4335/2024 · 2025-09-05

Alka Sarin

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4335-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 05.09.2025 Prabhu Dayal Yadav ... Petitioner(s) Versus Nishant Kumar Yadav and others ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Addl. AG Haryana for respondent Nos.1 to 3. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) CM-11229-CII-2025 1. This is an application for revival of the main case i.e. COCP- 4335-2024. 2. For the reasons mentioned therein, the same is allowed. Main case is restored to its original number and is taken on Board today itself. COCP-4335-2024 3. Compliance report by way of an affidavit dated 05.07.2025 of Naresh Kumar, Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Farrukh Nagar has been filed in Court today, which is taken on record. Along with the compliance report, speaking order (Annexure R-1) has also been appended. Registry to scan the same and tag at the appropriate place. AMAN JAIN 2025.09.06 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment COCP-4335-2024 (O&M) --2-- 4. In view thereof, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the present contempt petition has since been rendered infructuous. 5. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 05.09.2025 Ankur ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO AMAN JAIN 2025.09.06 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment