PRABHU DAYAL YADAV v. NISHANT KUMAR YADAV AND OTHERS
COCP/4335/2024 · 2025-09-05
Alka Sarin
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101898 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101898 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-4335-2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 05.09.2025
Prabhu Dayal Yadav ... Petitioner(s) Versus Nishant Kumar Yadav and others ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Addl. AG Haryana for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
CM-11229-CII-2025
1.
This is an application for revival of the main case i.e. COCP- 4335-2024.
2.
For the reasons mentioned therein, the same is allowed. Main case is restored to its original number and is taken on Board today itself.
COCP-4335-2024
3.
Compliance report by way of an affidavit dated 05.07.2025 of Naresh Kumar, Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Farrukh Nagar has been filed in Court today, which is taken on record. Along with the compliance report, speaking order (Annexure R-1) has also been appended. Registry to scan the same and tag at the appropriate place.
AMAN JAIN 2025.09.06 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment
COCP-4335-2024 (O&M)
--2--
4.
In view thereof, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the present contempt petition has since been rendered infructuous.
5.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
05.09.2025 Ankur
( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking
Whether reportable: YES/NO
AMAN JAIN 2025.09.06 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment