Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101895 (PAT)

Vipul Singh @ Narendra Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./73379/2025 · 2025-11-17

Satyavrat Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73379 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2025 Thana- CHAORI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Vipul Singh @ Narendra Kumar Singh S/o Ganesh Singh R/o Village- Yoga Kharaicha, P.S- Chauri, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 17-11-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that on 07.05.2025 he demanded his share of property and grains from his stepbrothers when his stepbrothers Mukesh Singh and petitioner assaulted him by lathi and danda causing fracture of nose and blood oozed out from his mouth. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73379 of 2025(2) dt.17-11-2025 2/3 informant alleges that petitioner along with Mukesh Singh assaulted him causing injury on his nose but then there is only one injury suffered by the injured and the opinion with respect to the injury has been reserved as has been recorded at para 42 of the case diary. It is next submitted that the learned trial court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner recorded that the opinion has been opined to be grievous by placing reliance on para 42 of the case diary when the injury report as recorded at para 42 of the case diary does not record the nature of injury rather records that opinion is reserved. It is also submitted that two persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant but then there is only one injury and Mukesh Singh was taken in custody and he has already been released on regular bail by the learned District Court. 5. Mr. Rabindra Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73379 of 2025(2) dt.17-11-2025 3/3 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Chauri P.S. Case No. 70 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Kundan/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T