HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11826 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " (a). issue a direction, directing the Civil Judge (J.D.) Kaushambi to decide the application paper No. 6 Ga dated 11.09.2025 for interim injunction filed in support of Civil Suit No. 625 of 2025 (Mohd. Murtaza and another Vs. Mohd. Arif @ Guddu Khan) pending before Civil Judge (J.D.) Kaushambi within short span of time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Kaushambi to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 25, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar Singh, Arun Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Mohd. Murtaza And Another .....Petitioner(s) Mohd. Arif @ Guddu Khan .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad