IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 124 CR-6641-2025 Date of Decision:22.09.2025 Usha Rani …..Pe))oner Vs. Hawa Singh .….Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Ms. Pinki Mehla, Advocate for the peoner. (through Video Conferencing). **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) In compliance of the order dated 19.09.2025, learned counsel for the peoner has placed on record copy of the zimni orders passed by the trial Court right from the filing of the suit. 2. By way of this peon filed under Arcle 227 of Constuon of India, peoner prays for se,ng aside the order dated 06.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the trial Court, whereby evidence of the peoner i.e. plainff was closed in civil suit No.1283 of 2019 tled as “Usha Rani vs. Hawa Singh”. 3. Learned counsel for the peoner contends that though peoner had been provided various opportunies and the case was fixed for 06.09.2025 with last opportunity but one day prior thereto, peoner had suddenly fallen ill, due to which she could not appear. Learned counsel for the peoner has drawn a=enon towards (Annexure P-3), which is OPD Card of Urban PHC Krishna Nagar Gamri, as per which she was NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.09.22 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-6641-2025 suffering from fever on that date, incapacitang her to appear on 06.09.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the peoner further contends that only one opportunity be provided to the peoner to conclude the evidence, which she shall produce at her own responsibility. 5. Without issuing any noce to the respondent, lest it may delay the disposal of the main case before the trial Court, this peon is hereby disposed of with the direcon to the trial Court to grant one opportunity to the peoner to conclude her evidence which shall be produced by her at her own responsibility. 6. This order is subject to payment of ₹10,000/- as cost payable by the peoner to the respondent through a Demand DraG. 7. Trial Court shall fix a date for producon of the remaining evidence by the peoner, on which date the cost shall also be paid prior to taking of the evidence. 8. Since this order has been passed without issuing any noce to the respondent, therefore, respondent will be at liberty to approach this Court, in case, he feels aggrieved. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE September 22, 2025 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.09.22 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document