Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101890 (MAD)

R.RUBESH v. STATE REP.BY

CRL OP/25410/2025 · 2025-09-16

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.25410 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.25410 of 2025 R. Rubesh ... Petitioner/ A3 Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, T4, Maduravoyal Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.473 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.473 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. Gokula Krishnan For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******* 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25410 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.07.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 311 and 351(3) of BNS in Crime No.473 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused had demanded money from the defacto complainant, who is a juice seller and while he refused, the petitioner along with other accused abused, assaulted and threatened the defacto complainant of dire consequences. It is further stated that the petitioner and other accused had robbed a sum of Rs.640/- from the defacto complainant at knife point. Hence, this case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25410 of 2025 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and states that the petitioner has 9 previous cases of similar nature; and that the investigation is pending. 5. Heard the learned counsels and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts of the case and previous antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 16.09.2025 stn K. RAJASEKAR, J. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25410 of 2025 stn To The Inspector of Police, T4, Maduravoyal Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.473 of 2025) Crl.O.P. No.25410 of 2025 16.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis