TIRLOK SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/29844/2024 · 2025-01-24
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101882 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101882 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
104/4 IN T
Tirlok Singh and
State of Haryana
CORAM: HON
Present: Mr.
Ms. T
TRIBHUVAN D
CM No.808 of 20
2. of hearing of the m Main Case
the instant petitio revision of pay
judgment dated 1 titled K.L. Vasude has attained finali v. K.L. Vasudeva
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-2984
Date of De
h and another
Versus ryana and Others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBH Mr. Rajbir Singh Kadian, Advocate Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryan AN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL)
of 2025 Application is allowed. For the reasons stated in the appl f the main case is advanced to today i
Learned counsel for the petitioner petition is for re-fixation of the petitio pay-scales. The issue stands decide ated 16.05.2023 rendered in Civil W sudeva and others v. State of Harya finality as LPA No.1960 of 2023 title eva and others, filed against it, also NJAB AND HARYANA 9844-2024 of Decision : 24.01.2025
…Petitioners
….Respondents RIBHUVAN DAHIYA ocate for the petitioner. aryana.
e application, it is allowed. The date oday itself, and is taken on Board. itioners contends that claim raised in petitioners’ pension on the basis of decided in petitioners’ favour vide ivil Writ Petition No.26015 of 2013 aryana and another. The judgment 23 titled State of Haryana and others t, also stands dismissed.
date ed in is of vide 2013 ment ers PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.31 14:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-29844-2024
2. considered as pe hereinabove, and within two month him within two w
3. counsel for the pe terms thereof.
4.
5. officer concerned
January 24, 2025 ps
2024 (O&M)
-2- Learned State counsel contends th as per law laid down by this Court e, and an appropriate order will be pas months. The due benefits, as found a two weeks thereafter. In view of the statement made by the petitioners has no objection to the Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed w cerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to th
, 2025
Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable
ends that the petitioner’s case will be Court in the judgments mentioned be passed by the competent authority ound admissible, will be released to ade by learned State counsel, learned to the petition being disposed of in sed within the stipulated period, the 0 to the petitioners.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE
: Yes/No
: Yes/No
ill be oned ority d to rned of in , the YA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.31 14:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document