Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101878 (PAT)

Vijeta Shweta Kumari v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./28529/2024 · 2025-11-18

Sunil Dutta Mishra

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28529 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-699 Year-2022 Thana- PARSABAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== Vijeta Shweta Kumari W/o Raju Ranjan Choudhary, D/o Sri Vijay Kumar Choudhary R/o 107, Gandhi Nagar Colony, Jehanabad at present R/o Budh vihar Colony, Nathupur, P.S. - Parsa Bajar, Dist - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Raju Ranjan Choudhary S/o Ramanuj Choudhary R/o vill - Shahar Rampur, P.S. - Naubatpur, Dist. - Patna at present Shanti Vihar Colony, Dariyapur, P.S. - Parsa Bajar, Distt. - Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Chandra Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 18-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This Cr. Misc. petition has been filed to cancel the bail of the O.P. No. 2 which was granted by learned Additional Sessions Judge-XVI, Patna vide order dated 06.10.2023 in A.B.P. No. 8871 of 2023, arising out of Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No. 699 of 2022. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the O.P. No. 2 had stated before the learned Trial Court that he is ready to keep the petitioner with all honour and dignity, accordingly, the bail was granted to him by the learned Trial Court. He further submits that in Matrimonial Case No. 1405 of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28529 of 2024(2) dt.18-11-2025 2/2 2022 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act (Restitution of Conjugal Rights), the O.P. No. 2 refused to keep the petitioner at her matrimonial home, as such, conciliation process was failed. Petitioner is ready to reside with the O.P. No. 2. Learned counsel lastly submits that mediation proceeding has not been done in this case, accordingly, this case may be disposed of with direction to the learned Trial Court for initiation of mediation between the parties. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that learned Trial Court may initiate the mediation proceeding between the parties. 5. In view of the submission of learned counsel for the parties, the present case stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file petition before the learned Trial Court for mediation/conciliation between the parties. 6. On filing such petition by the petitioner, learned Trial Court is directed to take steps for mediation/conciliation between the parties. utkarsh/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T