PINNAMANENI RATISH KUMAR v. PINNAMANENI VIJAYLAXMI
CRP/1002/2019 · 2025-01-24
T C D Sekhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10187 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10187 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
0APHC010115062019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: Pinnamaneni Ratish Kumar Pinnamaneni Vijaylaxmi Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A TULSI RAJ GOKUL Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1002/2019 Pinnamaneni Ratish Kumar ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3505] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT
ORDER:
The present revision is filed against the order 08.02.2019 passed in I.A.No.762 of 2018 in F.C.O.P.No.232 of 2016, on the file of the principal Family Court-Cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the F.C.O.P.No.232 of 2016, on the file of IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, was compromised between the parties by order dated 09.04.2022.
3. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision petition and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
4. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
Date:24.01.2025 TJN
264 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
C.R.P.No.1002 OF 2019 Date: 24.01.2025
TJN