CRWP-10228 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 112 Pritam Kaur @ Preetam Kaur State of Punjab Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent nos. protection of life and liberty of the petitioner as well as his family members who are apprehending danger at the behest of respondent nos. for taking action on his complaint/representation dated P-2). 2. regarding demarcation of the land bearing Khasra No.563 village Bhari respondent nos.5 to 7, under the garb of demarcation, are trying to take forcible possession of the land of the petitioner and they even given beatings to the petitioner in presence of responden complaint/representation dated but no action has been taken till date. 3. 10228-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Pritam Kaur @ Preetam Kaur Versus State of Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Sherry K. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent nos. protection of life and liberty of the petitioner as well as his family members who are apprehending danger at the behest of respondent nos. for taking action on his complaint/representation dated Learned counsel for the petitioner states that regarding demarcation of the land bearing Khasra No.563 village Bhari Mansa, Tehsil Ahmedgarh, District Malerkotla and the private respondent nos.5 to 7, under the garb of demarcation, are trying to take forcible possession of the land of the petitioner and they even given beatings to the petitioner in presence of respondent no.4. complaint/representation dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure P but no action has been taken till date. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10228-2025 Decided on:22.09.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Advocate, The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner as well as his family members who are apprehending danger at the behest of respondent nos.5 to 7 and also for taking action on his complaint/representation dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure Learned counsel for the petitioner states that there is a dispute regarding demarcation of the land bearing Khasra No.563-140, situated at Mansa, Tehsil Ahmedgarh, District Malerkotla and the private respondent nos.5 to 7, under the garb of demarcation, are trying to take forcible possession of the land of the petitioner and they even given beatings to the t no.4. The petitioner has submitted a .2025 (Annexure P-2) to respondent no.2 Notice of motion to the official respondents only. ...Petitioner ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner as well as his family members to 7 and also .2025 (Annexure there is a dispute 140, situated at Mansa, Tehsil Ahmedgarh, District Malerkotla and the private respondent nos.5 to 7, under the garb of demarcation, are trying to take forcible possession of the land of the petitioner and they even given beatings to the The petitioner has submitted a ) to respondent no.2 VINOD KUMAR 2025.09.22 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10228 4. respondent-State. 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2 Malerkotla, to decide the representation (Annexure P grant her and h liberty is perceived. 6. the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. September 22 vinod* 10228-2025 Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts n State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District , to decide the representation (Annexure P and her family members protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. September 22, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Senior Superintendent of Police, District , to decide the representation (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner and family members protection, if any threat to their life and It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES otice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Senior Superintendent of Police, District ) of the petitioner and family members protection, if any threat to their life and It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. VINOD KUMAR 2025.09.22 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document