288 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRR-3684-2018 (O&M) Decided on:22.04.2025 Abdul Kareem .... Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Nitesh Sharma, DAG, Punjab. **** Harpreet Singh Brar, J. (Oral) Present revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 29.11.2017 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Rupnagar vide which the judgement of conviction and order of sentence dated 20.04.2015 passed by learned JMIC, Anandpur Sahib were upheld. 2. Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today as well. It appears that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. 3. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution accordingly. 4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stands disposed of. 22.04.2025 (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No SONIA BURA 2025.04.24 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document