HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34180 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Shri Aditendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents, Shri Shiv Prakash Gupta, learned counsel for the Meerut Development Authority and Shri Chandra Pal Tiwari, learned counsel for the private respondent no.4. 2. The instant writ petition is preferred with request to issue direction to the respondent no.2, Meerut Development Authority not to purchase the land of Khasra Nos.577, 579, 604, 615, 619M and 620 situated at Gram Sabha Daulatpur, Fakarabad, Kayasth Gaunari, Pargana and Tehsil Meerut and restrain the respondent no.2 from initiating the process of purchase of the said land till disposal of Suit No.7 of 2019 and 8 of 2019 filed by the plaintiff-petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition and submitted that the petitioner is seeking enforcement of common law rights for protection of her property. The impleadment of the State respondents is not for claiming any constitutional or statutory rights against the State. They have been impleaded for taking action, for protection of the property rights against the private individuals. 4. A writ petition for enforcement of the extraordinary remedies under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not ordinarily maintainable for such reliefs against persons, who do not have any public duties to perform. The petitioner has adequate and efficacious alternative remedies of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditendra Singh, Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shiv Prakash Gupta Smt. Munesh Nehra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) approaching the appropriate forum for seeking the remedies. 5. Confronted with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed and leave may be accorded to press the relief before appropriate forum. 6. With the aforesaid leave, the instant writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. September 25, 2025 RKP WRIC No. 34180 of 2025 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad